AuthorAdam Owen

How To Choose a Web Hosting Provider

When deciding on a web host for your website or blog, there are a number of things to consider when comparing web hosting plans.

Price

Whilst you should never shop solely on price when it comes to web hosting, price is of course still an important thing to consider. Though if the price seems too good to be true, you’ll likely get what you pay for and suffer (either from downtime, poor support etc.) as a result.

Disk Space

How much disk space does your plan come with?

Do you upload many images, maybe you’re a photographer with a portfolio site full of photographs? In this case, you’ll need a web hosting plan with plenty of disk space. Many web hosts offer plans with unlimited disk space. Do make sure you read the terms & conditions though – you can’t simply upload your movie collection.

Location

Many of the ‘major’ web hosts only have servers in the US, so if most of your visitors are in Europe, you may want to look elsewhere.

Whilst you could use a CDN, it’s always best to have your main server in the country which most of your visitors are located in. In my case, this site is hosted with WebHostingBuzz in England, UK.

Uptime

Always look for a web host offering at least 99.9% uptime. You can then monitor uptime using a service such as Pingdom, and will be entitled to complain if the guaranteed uptime levels are not met over the course of a month.

Control Panel

Which control panel do they offer? cPanel? Plesk? Maybe even a custom control panel?

cPanel/WHM is my personal favourite platform, not just because it has plenty of features, but also down to the fact that it is quick and easy to migrate from one host to another – the majority of hosts will even take care of the migration process for you free of charge if you use cPanel.

 

Final note:

Personally, I would avoid any of the following hosts who I class as poor:
HostGator – Low-quality, unreliable web hosting.
1&1 – Terrible ‘robotic’ support team.

Apache vs Nginx – Web Server Comparison

When setting up a server to host your website, you may just think it’s best to accept the default web server software (usually Apache) and move on. However, there’s increasing discussion that using Nginx instead can massively improve site speed.

You could think of Apache as the ‘Microsoft Word’ of web servers. It can be a little slow to load, but is packed with features and can do pretty much everything you could possibly need from a web server.

On the other hand, Nginx could be compared to a more basic editor such as Notepad. It’s fast, lightweight, great for writing text and making minor adjustments, but lacks some of the features offered by Word. Whilst this is a weird analogy, it is fairly true.

To go into more detail and compare the features of each, here’s a brief comparison:

Apache Web Server

Advantages:

  • Apache is at present the most popular web server.
  • Uses .htaccess which is useful for adding redirects.

Disadvantages:

  • Slow compared to Nginx.

Nginx Web Server

Advantages:

  • Lightening fast. This is due to the fact that Nginx doesn’t need to create a new process for each HTTP request, and can instead make use of multiplexing.
  • Uses much less CPU and memory resources.

Disadvantages:

  • Not compatible with cPanel yet (Nginx support is on their roadmap).
  • No .htaccess file.
  • No ‘mod_rewrite’ module.
  • Less support options compared to Apache, though the online community is growing.

 

If you are worried about compatibility issues with the back-end of Apache (for example, losing the .htaccess file and mod_rewrite module), a method often recommended is to keep using Apache for your back-end, then use Nginx for your front-end. If you are using cPanel too, and don’t want to move to Nginx because of this, you can also use this method of combining the two to get the best of both.

Telia Transatlantic Cable Outage

Please note, updates to this post can be found further down the page.

It seems that Telia, one of the underwater transatlantic cables which connects the Internet between Europe and the US, has been reportedly cut or damaged. The specific cable believed to have been cut was TAT-14, the route of which can be seen below as it travels from the US through to the UK, France, the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark.

TAT-14 Telia Transatlantic Cable Map

For a large number of Internet users in Europe, this resulted in outages of many popular sites including Dropbox, and sites using CloudFlare, until hosts were able to re-route web traffic via other unaffected routes.

Luckily, there are many other transatlantic cables, so this didn’t take too long, and it was at most an hour or so before sites could be accessed again – although there was considerable congestion afterwards, as can be seen by the below screenshot of Akamai‘s website late on 19th May.

Telia Transatlantic Cable Akamai

News quickly spread on a number of online forums including:

TheRegister also published an article on this – although fairly late after it happened.

Digital Ocean and CloudFlare seemed to be the two companies mostly affected (who it is assumed have transit links with Telia), but many other websites and web hosts were indirectly affected through customers using an ISP which uses Telia as one of their connections.

Digital Ocean:

Digital Ocean Status - Telia Cable

CloudFlare:

A number of users also took to Twitter to find out if they were the only ones experiencing problems accessing certain parts of the Internet:

UPDATE (11:45pm GMT – 19th May):

Telia has released a statement via Twitter which explains the cause of the outage as a ‘planned update gone wrong’

Which roughly translates from Swedish to:

“Our previous disruption on our internet traffic against the United States and Asia is eliminated since 23 o’clock, it was a planned update went wrong”

UPDATE 2 (12 midnight GMT – 19th May:

Telia have now published an article in Swedish, in which Bo Djurberg (Manager at Telia) summarises the issues they had.

Again, roughly translated this is:

Problems with Telia Internet
Telia had tonight big problems with their Internet services.
Users could not get into websites registered in the United States.
– There was a scheduled job that went a bit wrong, says Bo Djurberg, manager at Telia.
The problems started at 22 o’clock on Monday evening.
Lots of customers had problems with the internet connection. According to Telia these involved a planned update that went wrong.
– They had problems reaching websites in the U.S. and vice versa, says Bo Djurberg.
At 23 o’clock the problems were remedied, according to Telia.
– Now everything will work out. All traffic was down for about an hour, says Djurberg.
Exactly how many users are affected is not clear.

UPDATE 3 (8am GMT – 20th May):

A further statement by Telia says that the issue was caused by a software ‘route change’ rather than the physical cable being cut. This explains how Telia were able to fix the problem so soon – something which likely wouldn’t have been so soon had it been cut.

UPDATE 4 (10am GMT – 20th May):

Further confirmation of this being a ‘planned update’


This post will be updated as and when more information is released.

UPDATE 5 (4pm GMT – 20th May):

This will likely be the last update, so I just wanted to summarise all of the updates and new developments since this post was first published.

This morning, Telia announced that the disruption was due to a ‘planned update went wrong’. There was no physical damage or cut to any of the cables, so it seems they were doing some form of software update for the cable (which we believe was TAT-14), which didn’t go as planned and resulted in the cable failing to carry data and going out of service.

Thankfully the downtime last night didn’t last too long as ISPs and web hosts were quick to re-route traffic via alternate transit carriers. There are many other transatlantic fibre cables, so this wouldn’t have been to hard – although congestion was caused as traffic had to be funneled to these other routes.

 

Were you affected by the Telia issues? Please get in touch (adam[at]adamowen.co.uk), or add a comment and I’ll feature your quote.

I also wrote another article for my company here – http://www.spiralmedia.co.uk/slow-internet-last-night.

Lincoln Grand Prix Cycle Race 2014

Attracting riders from around the world, the Lincoln Grand Prix Cycle Race is a legendary 125-mile cycle race covering Lincoln and the surrounding area.

This year was mainly a wet and rainy race, though there were some spots of sun throughout the day.

Finishing positions for the Lincoln Grand Prix Cycle Race 2014 main race were:

  1. Yanto Barker (Team Raleigh) – 4:37:46
  2. Mike Northey (Madison Genesis)
  3. Marcin Bialoblocki (Velosure Giordana Racing Team)
  4. Thomas Moses (Rapha Condor JLT)
  5. Nathan Edmondson (Velosure Giordana Racing Team)
  6. Adam Blythe (NFTO Pro Cycling)
  7. Liam Holoham (Madison Genesis)
  8. Jack Pullar (Starley Primal Pro Cycling)
  9. Mark Christian (Team Raleigh)
  10. Evan Oliphant (Team Raleigh)

20140511_141301(0)20140511_15454720140511_15445120140511_154547(1)

Well done to all of the riders – incredible achievement just to finish..

© 2024 Adam's Blog

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑